about those difficult conversations

There is a certain fetish among a segment of our population for the notion that if only there were a way to openly dialogue about difficult subjects where there is disagreement and differences, people would see the light and come to see things in harmony.

Nicholas Kristof is an exemplar of why this is a fantasy. For too many of the conversational fetishists the light is predetermined to be their own conclusion on the matter, meaning they aren’t thinking of a conversation between two reasonable beings, they’re imagining a lecture from one point of view, with the demand of submissive agreement from those who might deign to state disagreement before being enlightened. It’s a disheartening dynamic.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Culture, Rhetoric and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s